[ISW] 이란 업데이트 특별 보고서, 2026년 4월 28일

“`html

핵심 요약:

  • 이란의 최신 제안은 양보를 담고 있지 않으며, 테헤란의 조건으로 전쟁을 끝내려는 이란의 시도를 보여줍니다. 이 제안은 이란의 현 결정권자인 이슬람 혁명 수비대 사령관 아흐마드 바히디 소장이 이란이 심각한 피해를 입었음에도 불구하고 승리하고 있다고 믿고 있음을 나타냅니다. 미국은 4월 26일의 최신 제안이 이란의 핵 프로그램 문제를 해결하지 못했고, 이란이 호르무즈 해협에 대한 “통제”를 주장하도록 했기 때문에 여전히 반대하고 있습니다.
  • 이란의 석유 저장 및 수출 문제 증가는 협상에서 이란의 계산을 변화시킬 수 있는 한 가지 메커니즘이 될 수 있습니다. 이란은 또한 경제의 다른 부분에서도 상당한 압력에 직면해 있습니다. 하지만 이란 경제에 대한 이러한 압력이 바히디와 그의 핵심 측근들이 미국에 양보하도록 할지는 불분명합니다.
  • 이란 최고 국가 안보 의사 결정 기구는 경제 악화와 사회적 압력이 심화됨에 따라 잠재적인 시위 물결에 대비하고 있습니다. 이란의 장기간 인터넷 차단 또한 심각한 경제적 피해를 초래하고 실업률을 가속화하여 정권 안정에 대한 압력을 높일 가능성이 있습니다.
  • 이란 국회의장 모하마드 바게르 갈리바프는 바히디와 그의 핵심 측근들의 반대 조짐에도 불구하고 정치적 지지를 유지하고 협상에서 핵심 행위자로 남으려 노력하는 것으로 보입니다.
  • 강경파 간의 내분은 협상에 대한 정권 내 경쟁 속에서 공개적인 언론 대결로 확대되었습니다. 실용적인 강경파와 극단적인 강경파 사이의 정권 내부 권력 투쟁은 결정적인 중앙 중재자가 부재함을 나타내며, 이는 분파 간의 분쟁이 공개적으로 벌어지도록 허용했습니다.
  • 이란은 미국 및 이스라엘과의 잠재적인 갈등 재개를 준비하면서 러시아 및 중국과 같은 미국의 주요 적대국들과 계속 협력하고 있습니다.

최신 자료 및 관련 링크:

다음은 이란 관련 최근 소식과 관련 자료를 제공하는 몇 가지 링크입니다. (해당 링크의 내용 확인은 필요합니다.)

  • Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) – Iran: 외교 협의회(CFR)의 이란 관련 페이지로, 이란 핵 문제, 지역 안보, 경제 및 정치 상황에 대한 최신 분석과 보고서를 제공합니다. (영어)
  • Atlantic Council – Iran Initiative: 애틀랜틱 카운슬의 이란 이니셔티브는 이란의 국내외 정책, 핵 프로그램, 지역 영향력에 대한 심층적인 연구와 분석을 제공합니다. (영어)
  • U.S. Department of State – Iran: 미국 국무부의 이란 관련 페이지로, 외교, 제재, 인권 등 미국 정부의 정책 및 입장을 확인할 수 있습니다. (영어)
  • Reuters – Oil: 로이터 통신의 유가 관련 기사. 이란의 석유 수출 및 저장과 관련된 정보를 얻을 수 있습니다. (영어)
  • BBC News – Korean: BBC 한국어 뉴스. 이란 관련 국내외 정세 보도를 확인할 수 있습니다.

주의사항: 제시된 링크의 내용은 시간이 지남에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 링크가 제공하는 정보의 정확성은 항상 확인해야 합니다.

“`

[원문]

Iran’s latest proposal in negotiations offers no concessions and represents an Iranian effort to end the war on Tehran’s terms.

April 28, 2026

Data Cutoff: 2:00 PM ET

Katherine Wells, Adham Fattah, Ben Rezaei, Ria Reddy, Ben Schmida, Parker Hempel, Will Doran, Carolyn Moorman, Avery Borens, and Brian Carter

As the Middle East crisis evolves, ISW urgently needs your support.

Help us stay independent and impactful.

TOPLINES

Iran’s latest proposal in negotiations offers no concessions and represents an Iranian effort to end the war on Tehran’s terms. The proposal, according to unspecified officials familiar with the matter speaking to the Wall Street Journal and an Iranian political analyst close to the regime, centers on a three-stage plan. In the first stage, the United States and Israel would commit to a permanent and guaranteed end to the war. In the second stage, the United States and Iran would negotiate over the status of the Strait of Hormuz, and the United States would lift its blockade on Iranian ports. Iran still aims to exert sovereignty over the Strait after the war by charging tolls on vessels passing the Strait and would seek to satisfy this demand in negotiations, according to the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. In the third stage, Iran and the United States would begin negotiating over the nuclear issue.

Iran’s growing challenges in storing and exporting its oil could be one mechanism by which Iranian calculations change in negotiations. A US Sanctions analyst at Foundation for Defense of Democracies assessed on April 12 that Iran had about 13 remaining days of usable oil storage, which he calculated based on 50 to 55 million barrels of total onshore storage that was 60% full on April 12. Iran likely extended the number of days before its oil storage is full by using old oil tanks in poor condition. Iran reactivated a 30-year-old very large crude carrier (VLCC) during April to hold oil, for example. The VLCC had been unused for three years. Market intelligence firm Kpler assessed on April 27 that Iran has between 12 and 22 remaining days before its oil storage is full. Kpler’s 12-day estimate assumes that not all storage tanks can be used, but the basis for that assumption is not clear. Iran has recently activated storage facilities that are suboptimal, but those storage facilities presumably have other costs for Iranian capacity and oil exports associated with them. US President Donald Trump posted on April 28 on Truth Social that Iran told the United States that it is in a “state of collapse” and that Iran wants an end to the US blockade as soon as possible.

Iran faces significant pressure on other parts of its economy. Combined force strikes during the war, as well as Iran’s difficulties with storing and exporting oil, have had negative ripple effects on other sectors of Iran’s economy. Reuters reported on April 27 that combined force strikes, including strikes on major Iranian steel producers such as the Mobarakeh Steel Company and Khuzestan Steel Company, reportedly destroyed about 25 to 30 percent of Iran’s total steel output. A chemical engineer working at one of Iran’s biggest private construction contractors told the Associated Press on April 28 that it had to shut down a project with Mobarakeh, which cost 1,000 jobs. The son of an Iranian rugmaker told AP that around 80% of rug and carpet manufacturers have stopped operations in the industrial zone of Kashan, Esfahan Province, due to the plummet of Iranian exports during the war. A US sanctions analyst assessed on April 27 that the US blockade has exacerbated Iran’s gasoline crisis by preventing Iran from importing gasoline to sufficiently address Iran’s fuel needs. Gasoline shortages previously caused mass protests in 2019.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Iran’s latest proposal in negotiations offers no concessions and represents an Iranian effort to end the war on Tehran’s terms. The proposal illustrates that Iran’s current decisionmaker, Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Commander Major General Ahmad Vahidi, believes Iran is winning despite the serious damage Iran has suffered. The United States remains opposed to the most recent April 26 proposal because it failed to address both Iran’s nuclear program and enabled Iran to assert “control” over the Strait of Hormuz.

  • Iran’s growing challenges in storing and exporting its oil could be one mechanism by which Iranian calculations change in negotiations. Iran also faces significant pressure on other parts of its economy. It is unclear, however, whether this pressure on Iran’s economy will cause Vahidi and his inner circle to make concessions to the United States.

  • Iran’s highest national security decision-making body is preparing for a potential protest wave as economic deterioration and social pressure intensify. Iran’s prolonged internet shutdown is also posing severe economic damage and accelerating unemployment, which likely increases pressure on regime stability.

  • Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf appears to be trying to retain political support and remain a key actor in negotiations despite prior signs of opposition from Vahidi and his inner circle. 

  • Infighting among hardline factions has escalated into a public media confrontation amid intra-regime competition over negotiations. Intra-regime power struggle between pragmatic hardliners and ultrahardliners indicates the absence of a decisive central arbiter, which has allowed factional disputes to unfold publicly.

  • Iran continues to cooperate with key US adversaries, such as Russia and China, as it prepares for a potential resumption of conflict with the United States and Israel.

EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

ISW offers customizable email subscription options. Click below to learn more and customize your preferences.

Website | Jobs | Internships

Follow ISW on social media:

FacebookXYouTube | InstagramLinkedIn | Threads | Bluesky

© 2026 Institute for the Study of War and AEI’s Critical Threats Project. All rights reserved.

Donate online or by sending a check to the Institute for the Study of War at 1400 16th Street NW, Suite #515, Washington, DC 20036. Please consider including the Institute for the Study of War in your estate plans.

ISW is a tax-exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Donations are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.

ISW is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization. ISW advances an informed understanding of military affairs through reliable research, trusted analysis, and innovative education. We are committed to improving the nation’s ability to execute military operations and respond to emerging threats in order to achieve US strategic objectives.

댓글 달기

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

위로 스크롤