[ISW] 이란 업데이트, 2025년 9월 12일

“`html

핵심 요약:

  • 최고 지도자 승계: 영국 소재 뉴스 사이트가 인용한 고위 이란 외교관에 따르면, 이란 최고 국가 안보 위원회(SNSC) 사무총장 알리 라리자니와 전 제1 부통령 모하마드 모크베르가 하메네이와 가장 빈번하게 접촉하며, 승계 시 정권 내 영향력 확대를 모색하고 있습니다.
  • 도하 IDF 공격: 이란 관리들은 이스라엘의 9월 9일 카타르 도하 공격을 이용하여 미국을 걸프 국가의 신뢰할 수 없는 안보 보증인으로 묘사하고, 이 지역에서 형성되고 있는 반(反)이란 연합을 와해하려는 시도를 하고 있습니다. 이란의 이러한 시도는 걸프 국가들이 미국 또는 이스라엘과 협력하는 것을 막기 위한 것이지만, 성공할 가능성은 극히 낮습니다. 그러나 이란은 미국 주도의 반이란 연합 구축 노력을 훼손하기 위해 점진적인 연합 와해 전략을 설계했을 것으로 추정됩니다.
  • 도하 IDF 공격: 중화인민공화국(PRC) 역시 미국의 이 지역 내 역할에 의문을 제기하려 하고 있습니다. 이들의 서술은 이란과 조율된 것은 아니지만, 미국의 지역 내 지지 감소라는 이란의 목표를 지원합니다. PRC는 이스라엘의 도하 공격에 대한 미국의 역할을 부정확하게 묘사하며, 미국이 걸프 국가의 신뢰할 수 없는 안보 파트너임을 증명하려 시도합니다.

최신 자료 및 관련 링크:

아래는 본문 내용과 관련된 최신 자료 및 링크입니다. 링크의 내용이 정확한지 확인하시기 바랍니다.

“`
**주의:**

* 위에 제공된 링크들은 현재 시점에서 정확한 정보를 담고 있을 가능성이 높지만, 링크의 내용은 시간이 지남에 따라 변경될 수 있습니다.
* 이 번역은 원문의 내용을 최대한 정확하게 반영하려 했지만, 특정 표현의 뉘앙스나 미묘한 의미 차이가 있을 수 있습니다.
* 본 자료는 정보 제공을 목적으로 하며, 특정 입장을 대변하거나 정치적 의도를 가지고 있지 않습니다.

[원문]

Iranian officials are using Israel’s September 9 strike in Doha, Qatar, to frame the United States as an unreliable security guarantor for Gulf states

September 12, 2025

Information Cutoff: 2:00 pm ET

Adham Fattah, Johanna Moore, Avery Borens, Ben Schmida, Nidal Morrison, and Brian Carter

TOPLINES

Iranian officials are using Israel’s September 9 strike in Doha, Qatar, to frame the United States as an unreliable security guarantor for Gulf states in an effort to break the nascent anti-Iran coalition in the region. Israel’s September 9 airstrike targeting senior Hamas leaders in Doha, Qatar, caused the Gulf states to condemn Israeli actions. Iran has exploited these frustrations among Gulf states by questioning the reliability of US partnerships. Iranian officials have made statements and held a series of meetings and phone calls with Gulf and Arab states since September 9, in which they condemned the Israeli airstrike as a “violation of international law.” Iranian officials have misrepresented the degree of US knowledge of the Israeli strikes and have suggested that the US-brokered agreements are incapable of defending Arab states from Israeli attacks. The United States did not have adequate foreknowledge of the Israeli strike to discourage the Israelis from conducting the strike. Iranian officials have painted the Israeli strike as a direct threat to the security of Gulf countries and called for the international community to hold Israel accountable for its “criminal act.” Iran, of course, has repeatedly targeted Gulf states with much less precision and to much greater effect. Iran fired missiles and drones at the Saudi oil terminal in Dhafran in 2019, for example, which forced Saudi Arabia to dip into its oil reserves to support exports.

 

This Iranian effort to dissuade Gulf states from cooperating with the United States or Israel is extremely unlikely to succeed, but Iran has presumably designed a gradual coalition-breaking effort to undermine US-led efforts to forge an anti-Iran coalition in the Middle East. The US-led effort to forge this coalition has paid dividends for the United States in the Middle East already. Many Gulf and other Arab states contributed to Israel‘s defense against Iranian missile and drone attacks in April and October 2024, for example. This defense decreased the likelihood of further escalation between Iran and Israel by helping prevent any significant damage to Israel. One Iranian diplomatic push is extremely unlikely to undo the progress the United States has made towards forging an anti-Iran coalition, especially after the Iranian attack on Al Udeid Airbase in Qatar in June 2025. The recent Iranian rhetoric degrading US diplomatic and security partnerships is part of a long-running line of effort in a long-standing Iranian campaign to weaken the United States and secure Iran’s role as a regional hegemon. This line of effort has had no success to date.

 

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is similarly trying to sow doubt about the United States’ role in the region. These narratives, although not coordinated with Iran, support Iranian objectives to decrease regional support for the United States. The PRC’s Foreign Ministry stated on September 10 that the Israeli strikes were linked to the US bias towards Israel, implying that the United States ignored the Gulf states’ security concerns. Chinese state-owned media widely covered the Israeli strike in Doha and accused the United States of foreknowledge of the strikes. Chinese state media Xinhua reported on September 10 that the Israeli airstrikes in Doha were “a clear escalation” involving a sovereign Arab country that has no direct military hostilities with Israel. State broadcaster China Central Television (CCTV) reported on September 11 that it would have been “very difficult” for Israel to have launched its airstrikes on Doha without US approval. A Chinese scholar similarly told CCTV on September 11 that the United States did not attempt to stop the Israeli strikes after receiving advanced warning from Israel about the strikes. The PRC has previously tried to exploit unpopular US policies among Arab states to undermine the US role as the primary regional partner.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Supreme Leader Succession: Iranian Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Secretary Ali Larijani and former First Vice President Mohammad Mokhber are the regime stalwarts most in contact with Khamenei and are positioning themselves for more influence in the regime in the event of a succession, according to a senior Iranian diplomat cited by a UK-based news site.

  • IDF Strikes in Doha: Iranian officials are using Israel’s September 9 strike in Doha, Qatar, to frame the United States as an unreliable security guarantor for Gulf states in an effort to break the nascent anti-Iran coalition in the region. This Iranian effort to dissuade Gulf states from cooperating with the United States or Israel is extremely unlikely to succeed, but Iran has presumably designed a gradual coalition-breaking effort to undermine US-led efforts to forge an anti-Iran coalition in the Middle East.

  • IDF Strikes in Doha: The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is similarly trying to sow doubt about the United States’ role in the region. These narratives, although not coordinated with Iran, support Iranian objectives to decrease regional support for the United States. The PRC’s statements incorrectly characterize the United States’ role in Israel’s recent strikes in Doha and attempt to demonstrate that the United States is an unreliable security partner for Gulf states.

NEW EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION OPTIONS

ISW has launched newly customizable email subscription options. Existing subscribers have been auto enrolled in all lists. Click below to learn more about these options and customize your preferences.

ISW is powered by the support of individuals like you.

Help us stay independent and impactful.

Website | Jobs & Internships

Follow ISW on social media:

FacebookXYouTube | InstagramLinkedIn | Threads | Bluesky

Donate online or by sending a check to the Institute for the Study of War at 1400 16th Street NW, Suite #515, Washington, DC 20036. Please consider including the Institute for the Study of War in your estate plans.

ISW is a tax-exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Donations are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.

ISW is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization. ISW advances an informed understanding of military affairs through reliable research, trusted analysis, and innovative education. We are committed to improving the nation’s ability to execute military operations and respond to emerging threats in order to achieve US strategic objectives.

댓글 달기

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다

위로 스크롤